MDU Announces It Will Not Cover Non-FDA Dermal Fillers

Lorna Jackson
By Lorna Jackson

Lorna was Editor of Consulting Room (www.consultingroom.com), the UK's largest aesthetic information website, from 2003 to 2021.


The MDU, Medical Defence Union, the UK's leading medical defence organisation has announced some important changes to the provision of medical indemnity for those involved in facial aesthetics and the service provision of dermal fillers.

From 1st April 2013, the MDU membership benefits for members performing treatments with dermal fillers will change and they won’t be covered for dermal filler brands which don’t have an American FDA approval, despite dermal fillers in the UK being regulated by European CE Mark regulation. The MDU underwriters stated in a letter to members;

“While we carefully consider requests for help, it is unlikely that the MDU will provide support or representation for any claim arising in respect of a treatment or procedure carried out on or after 1st April 2013 which involves any dermal filler, unless the product is one which has been approved, prior to your use of it, by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the United States of America.”

A list of US FDA approved dermal fillers can be found on the FDA website:
www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ProductsandMedicalProcedures/CosmeticDevices/WrinkleFillers/ucm227749.htm

However, as many who view the list will note, it includes some now discontinued brands such as Evolence, Hylaform, Cosmoderm/Cosmoplast and Zyderm/Zyplast which simply confuse the issue.

 provision of medical indemnity for those involved in facial aesthetics

There are those who wish the MDU had published a comprehensive list of their own, even if it is said to rely on the FDA list, as many confusions are possible due to differing branding.

The MDU is advising members who administer dermal filler products as part of their practice, and use products/brands which have not been approved by the FDA to urgently review their indemnity arrangements for this work.

Many we have spoken to within the aesthetic industry find this to be an unusual stance for the indemnity provider to take, yet welcome a nod towards those products with a wealth of clinical data to back up their safety, compared to the now saturated levels of CE marked products available with little to substantiate their safety and efficacy.

With both the European Parliament and the Keogh Review both looking at the current regulation of medical devices, including dermal fillers, this MDU announcement perhaps is a pre-emptive move towards the likelihood of tighter European and UK regulation of these products in the future. It will be interesting to see if other insurers choose to follow suit or simply pick up extra business as a result of this decision from the MDU.

Pause

Keep In Touch

Ensure you and your staff stay up-to-date with key topics shaping the field of aesthetics.

Your free digital round-up of relevant aesthetic news articles and trending items delivered directly to your inbox.

Immerse yourself in our quarterly, complimentary, themed digital magazine, compiled by award-winning editor Vicky Eldridge.

Stay informed of new technologies and receive exclusive news and offers from carefully selected aesthetic partners.