Women With PIP Implants Should Have Ultrasound Says BAAPS

Posted on the 12 July 2010 at 16:47

The British Association of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons (BAAPS) has issued updated advice on Poly Implant Prothese (PIP) breast implants  in which they urge all women fitted with the devices, now known to be faulty, to undergo an ultrasound scan in the next six months, to determine whether there is any rupture or weakening of the implant.

"This is certainly an unusual situation but so far there is no serious cause for alarm”; highlighted Consultant Plastic Surgeon and BAAPS President, Nigel Mercer.  

“We recommend that women who've undergone breast augmentation contact their surgeons to find out what type of implant was used. If it's PIP they should have an ultrasound to establish whether there is any weakening or rupture.  At present removal is recommended in these cases, but if there is one ruptured implant, the contra-lateral one should be taken out as well, as a preventative measure."

At the end of March 2010, the French medical regulatory authority (AFSSAPS) informed our own MHRA (Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency) that it had suspended the marketing, distribution, export and use of the silicone gel filled PIP breast implants manufactured by a French company.  The French authority recalled all of these devices at that point.

On inspecting the PIP manufacturing facility, based between Marseille and Nice in the South of France, the AFSSAPS found that breast implants made by the company since 2001 had been filled with a silicone gel with a composition different from that used to obtain their original European CE Mark approval, making the illegal.

This discovery cast much concern over the safety of the products and the MHRA advised all U.K. patients fitted with the PIP implants to consult their implanting surgeon if they had any concerns, whilst the French authorities investigated further.

One Cosmetic Surgeon that I spoke to said; “Anecdotal experience revealed a high rupture rate from surgeons and if you look on blog sites there are a lot of women who had problems with them, mostly relating to rupture and its consequences (i.e. capsule, asymmetry, lumps etc).”

Recent updates from the French Society of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery (SOFCPRE) have now revealed that from 2005 onwards the company also dispensed with a protective barrier which normally surrounds an implant to offer strength and reduce the migration risk of the gel. In addition it became clear to SOFCPRE, on contacting the actual gel manufacturer of the substitute silicone gel used by the implant manufacturers that there was a lack of clinical data in relation to its possible reaction with the human body, as the substance was intended for use in mattresses and they were unaware of its eventual use in breast implants!

Despite proving unpopular with the majority of independent surgeons, who tended to prefer more expensive and better quality implant products which provided a lifetime guarantee against rupture for their patients, it has been estimated that roughly 50,000 women in the UK could have these PIP breast implants, as they were the product of choice for some clinics, particularly those larger cosmetic surgery chains where it was the bottom line which drove choice.

"This situation is clearly not the fault of the surgeon, who acted in good faith - it would be similar to blaming a dealership for a faulty car."; concluded Nigel Mercer.

A spokesperson for Clover Leaf  Products, the former distributor of PIP implants in the UK said on 23rd June; “All medical devices are regulated in the UK by the  MHRA who issued a device alert on the 31st March 2010. The action for surgeons on this alert was as follows: ‘Await further advice from the MHRA regarding clinical management of patients implanted with these devices’. To our knowledge this is still the case today and we are awaiting further information.”

Following delays from AFSSAPS who have stated that the results from their own tests are now expected in September, the UK’s MHRA  has decided to conduct its own toxicology tests into the gel contained within the PIP implants, which they state should be completed in mid-August.


Add Comment

To leave a comment you need to be logged in as a Cosmetic Community Member or a Clinic.

Please Click Here to login / register with the Cosmetic Community.

If you are a Clinic Click Here to login to the partners area of Consulting Room.

Blog Comment(s) [3]

Ok, that's fine, I have a pip implant, ruptured, still under a 10 year guarantee, saw my surgeon, who wants another 2,650 pounds to replace them! I paid for breast augmentation, got a 10 year guarantee, but they still won't replace them unless I pay out again. I am very worried and disheartened. I had an ultrasound last year and the surgeon is aware of the rupture.


MHRA says there investigation into PIP implants is due mid August. Could you tell me if this is still so. I have these implants and have felt ill and tired for over a year. MRI scan says no rupture, just leakage within normal limits. My breast feel lumpy but the clinic will not do anything until the French report is out in September. As this report was due earlier in the year I cannot say I have much confidence in this. I look forward to hearing from you with the results of your investigations.


There are currently no further updates from the MHRA on the results of their own testing or that of the French authorities. We are monitoring the situation and will report when anything new is released. You can also keep an eye on the MHRA website section on silicone gel breast implants where they are keeping a time line of the situation. Click here

Lorna Jackson | http://www.consultingroom.com