Children aren't influenced by Cosmetic Surgery Advertisements so why a call for a ban? Turf Wars!

Posted on the 11 January 2013 at 13:26


BAAPS call for a ban on cosmetic surgery advertising


Recently the British Association of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons (BAAPS) called for a ban on cosmetic surgery advertisements. BAAPS claim that ‘unhealthy psychological repercussions may develop as a result of the advertising of cosmetic surgery in public places’. BAAPS has asked the regulators to “prohibit all advertising aimed at the under-18s for example the use of young spokespeople such as celebrities that appeal to this age group” and to “prohibit advertising in public places where children can see these ads, such as posters, billboards, sides of buses and television”.
Everywhere we look we are being subject to the media’s warped image of what is the desirable body. Whether it is glossy magazines and papers, billboards, “reality” TV programs or the countless number of models we see online; it is these images that distort people’s perceptions of what is realistic. Banning the relatively small number of cosmetic adverts within this tsunami of perfect body imagery will not make the slightest difference. Furthermore the call to curb celebrity spokespersons popular amongst this age category is ludicrous. I can see the headlines now ‘Protest at No.10 for the removal of Amy Childs Twitter account.’

If on the other hand we accept the need to ban these ads - just what would we ban? Preventing advertisements in public places would be easy to do, but what would it achieve when the internet and use of social media are beasts of immeasurable proportions that recognise no geographical boundaries and are beyond control. What is the point in banning advertisements on the side of buses passing by children surfing the web on their smartphones.

For a moment let’s just assume that controlling advertising on the internet is possible. What would we prevent cosmetic surgeons from advertising? Surely a media group ‘Tweeting’, ‘Facebooking’ or blogging about cosmetic procedures in relation to a group of surgeons constitutes advertising. PR pieces about surgical issues featuring the views of past and present chairmen of such organisations calling for cosmetic bans simply represents one of the most influential forms of advertising conceived. “We don't agree with plastic surgery advertising but do read our article in The Times where I'm talking about my patient’s confidence boost from her new implants” is a mental pirouette that even our sleekest of Olympic gymnasts would be proud of.

Let me bring you back to reality and the real world. Why are BAAPS really calling for an advertising ban? Well the real reason has more to do with the fact that individual or small groups of surgeons that are represented by BAAPS are not able to finance expensive adverts in glossy magazines, Radio and TV campaigns or billboards. No this is the domain of the large cosmetic groups with their financial backers whose turnover is in the multi millions of pounds. So how do you fight this if you are an individual surgeon or small group of surgeons - you call for a cosmetic surgery advertising ban. Using body issues of young teens attracts people to back the ban, but in truth the distorted body images are implanted much early in a child’s development – the Barbie Doll and Disney Princesses are just a few of the early influences that shape a child’s perception of body image.

BAAPS are doing much good in raising public awareness about many issues within our poorly regulated cosmetic industry but we have to be careful to remain focused on what is important and indeed possible. There is little love lost between the independent surgeons and the big cosmetic chains but these issues must not influence political lobbying and policy making. There is no case for banning cosmetic adverts in public places and is simply a distraction from the key issue of achieving better regulation and protection for those receiving treatments.

Add Comment

To leave a comment you need to be logged in as a Cosmetic Community Member or a Clinic.

Please Click Here to login / register with the Cosmetic Community.

If you are a Clinic Click Here to login to the partners area of Consulting Room.

Blog Comment(s) [1]

Dr Patterson makes very valid points. This whole issue arose out of the PIP saga which was due to fraud by a device maker and how it passed through the regulators. Would a ban on advertising have prevented this kind of episode?
The issue of  'turf wars' is not new and exists in a variety of professions.  A recent editorial in the American Journal of Cosmetic Surgery looks at this very issue and makes fascinating reading. There has been a long history of this in the United States with actions by certain medical organisations considered unlawful, defamatory and anti competitive resulting in large fines being imposed. Regulation should be balanced, proportionate, practical and improve patient care but not increase unnecessary red tape.

Dr Sanjay Gheyi |